Not-So-Recent History


This is the old stuff, but still worth keeping around...


 Previously Reviewed Movies:

5 stars indicates best overall quality (acting, directing photography, etc, etc). I'll probably buy a 5 star movie when it comes out on video.

  • Mission:Impossible ****    Why not 5 stars? I have to agree with Peter Graves, they shouldn't have messed with the Phelps character. It left me heartsick and didn't ring true to those of us who were fans of the original TV series.
  • Dragonheart ***1/2  I loved this movie, even though the plot was unimaginative and Dennis Quaid kept losing his accent. The special effects were breathtaking, the story was charmingly told and the characters were engaging. Julie Christi's performance was wonderful. It is a loss for all that she doesn't work more often. Pete Postlethwaite is delightful as a monk scribe who is supposedly on pilgrimage. He is a consumate pro.
  • Eraser **1/2  Yes, I am giving The Arnold only two and a half stars. It wasn't entirely his fault. The film was very inconsistant: strong in some places, lame or inept in other. It was like they kept changing staff throughout the movie. Sometimes continuity was professional, sometimes it was incredibly bad (in one scene, the same jacket was taken off three times, for gosh sakes!)  Vanessa Williams could have found a far better vehicle for herself. She was strong through the entire film and handled the physicality masterfully, but the part was empty. Robert Pastorelli also did a standout job, but then his part had more flavor to it. Regarding James Caan's supposed comeback in this rôle, I thought he walked through his part in large sections of the movie. I did like the special effects, with the exception of a lame alligator sequence. The explosions were beautiful and Vanessa Williams went through the entire end of the movie without getting her peach sweater set dirty. I can't even get out of my apartment that clean.
  • Phenomenon  *** I originally gave this 5 stars when I reviewed it but I watched it a second time and decided it just wasn't that good. I don't know what my problem was the first time I watched it. I must have been in a soppy mood when I reviewed it the first time. Not a bad movie but not a great one either. I don't like "inspirational" films (nay, I hate them), but this film is well written, directed, cast, acted, and photographed. Warning: this is a bittersweet story, bring the hankies if you cry at movies.
  • Little Nicky *1/2   Have you ever seen a film for free and still felt faintly robbed? I qualified for a free sneak preview of this show. I admit I am probably giving this movie a half star more than it deserved because I didn't have to pay for it but still, it wasn't totally without redeeming qualities. Give me a moment, I am sure I'll come up with some. Oh yes! Harvey Keitel kept his clothes on the entire film (always a plus in my book). Rhys Ifans looked really hot in a fey sort of way. Adam was funny even if the material wasn't. I personally thought the best part of the film were the Austrian Heavy Death Metal Boys played by Peter Dante and Jonathan Loughran. They were inspired! The worst part was Patricia Arquette's performance. Oh my, she was awful. My advice? If you are at the video store and the only two videos left are Little Nicky and Piranha II: The Spawning, go with Little Nicky.

 Previously Reviewed Books:

  • "Dead Girls", Richard Calder, New York, NY, St. Martin's Paperbacks, 1992. Science Fiction. What he does to quantum mechanical theory, fractal math and childhood is obscene. He makes William Gibson look like a prissy coward. I felt the hair stand up on the back of my neck more than once and that hasn't happened since I read "Alien". I hate to think what he did in second and third part of this trilogy ("Dead Boys "and "Dead Things"). They are supposed to be even more "daring". Thumbs up
  • "Villains By Necessity", Eve Forward, New York, NY, Tom Doherty Associates (A Tor Book), 1995. Fantasy. This is the story of what happens when some of the bad guys left over from the triumph of Good and Light decide to do something about it. Random acts of senseless cruelty abound. This book is written with the evil characters as Protagonists, a refreshing change! [thumbs up!]
  • "Red Mars", Kim Stanley Robinson, New York, NY, Bantam Spectrum Press, 1993. Science Fiction. 1993 Nebula Award for Best Novel. May I be cruel here? Well, it's my web site, who is going to stop me? I thought this story was a "Dallas" on Mars with lots of science and mystism thrown in for good measure. It was well written at a technical, superficial level, but I felt the main characters were souless. The particulars of settling Mars make this book worth reading, they are handled spectacularly, but I doubt I will be reading "Green Mars" or "Blue Mars" (even though my father gave them to me for Christmas).

You can reach me by e-mail at: susana@oz.net

Go Home